Thanks. I know, my point was on why I get something printed by simply
doing line 1 below and at other occasions had to do line 2.
me.probit(obj)
v<-me.probit(obj); v
On 2020/11/30 下午 05:33, Jim Lemon wrote:
Hi Steven,
You seem to be assigning the result of me.oprobit(obj) to v instead of
printing it. By appending ";v" tp that command line, you implicitly
call "print".
Jim
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:15 PM Steven Yen <[email protected]> wrote:
I hope I can get away without presenting a replicable set of codes
because doing so would impose burdens.
I call a function which return a data frame, with the final line
return(out)
In one case the data frame gets printed (similar to a regression
printout), with simply a call
me.probit(obj)
In another case with a similar function, I could not get the results
printed and the only way to print is to do the following:
v<-me.oprobit(obj); v
This is a puzzle, and I hope to find some clues. Thanks to all.
My function looks like the following:
me.oprobit0 <- function(obj,mean=FALSE,vb.method,jindex=NA,
resampling=FALSE,ndraws=100,mc.method=1,times100=TRUE,
Stata.mu=FALSE,testing=FALSE,digits=3){
...
return(out) # out is a data frame
}
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
