... yes, but so does lm() for a categorical **INdependent** variable with more than 2 numerically labeled levels. n levels = (n-1) df for a categorical covariate, but 1 for a continuous one (unless more complex models are explicitly specified of course). As I said, the OP seems confused about whether he is referring to the response or covariates. Or maybe he just made the same typo I did.
Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 11:15 AM Patrick (Malone Quantitative) < mal...@malonequantitative.com> wrote: > No, R does not. glm() does in order to do logistic regression. > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paul Bernal <paulberna...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Bert, >> >> Thank you for the kind reply. >> >> But what if I don't turn the variable into a factor. Let's say that in >> excel I just coded the variable as 1s and 0s and just imported the dataset >> into R and fitted the logistic regression without turning any categorical >> variable or dummy variable into a factor? >> >> Does R requires every dummy variable to be treated as a factor? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Paul >> >> El sáb., 1 de agosto de 2020 12:59 p. m., Bert Gunter < >> bgunter.4...@gmail.com> escribió: >> >> > x <- factor(0:1) >> > x <- factor("yes","no") >> > >> > will produce identical results up to labeling. >> > >> > >> > Bert Gunter >> > >> > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along >> and >> > sticking things into it." >> > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 10:40 AM Paul Bernal <paulberna...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Dear friends, >> >> >> >> Hope you are doing great. I want to fit a logistic regression in R, >> where >> >> the dependent variable is the covid status (I used 1 for covid >> positives, >> >> and 0 for covid negatives), but when I ran the glm, R complains that I >> >> should make the dependent variable a factor. >> >> >> >> What would be more advisable, to keep the dependent variable with 1s >> and >> >> 0s, or code it as yes/no and then make it a factor? >> >> >> >> Any guidance will be greatly appreciated, >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> >> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> >> >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > > > -- > Patrick S. Malone, Ph.D., Malone Quantitative > NEW Service Models: http://malonequantitative.com > > He/Him/His > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.