That worked! Thanks for the explanation.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:06 AM Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 18/09/2019 8:43 a.m., Huzefa Khalil wrote:
> > Hello R-users,
> >
> > I have been running a script which produces objects based on the
> > column names of a data.frame. The column names are of the form CB_1-1,
> > CB_1-2, etc. Now this calculation was rather long and memory
> > intensive, so I would rather not have to do it again after fixing the
> > column names using "make.names". As a consequence, I am left with a
> > bunch of R objects with `-` in the name.
> > Accessing them is proving challenging and any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Reproducible example:
> > `cb_1-2` <- "hello world"
> > t <- "cb_1-2"
> > t <- as.name(t)
> > t <- eval(parse(text = t))
> >
> > Error in eval(parse(text = t)) : object 'cb_1' not found
>
> After t <- as.name(t), you already have language: no need to parse it
> again. So
>
> eval(t)
>
> works. If you have more complicated expressions, use call() to set them
> ụp. For example, call("paste0", t, "!") evaluates to
>
> paste0(`cb_1-2`, "!")
>
> and evaluating that expression via
>
> eval(call("paste0", t, "!"))
>
> gives
>
> [1] "hello world!"
>
> Don't go back and forth between language objects and text
> representations of them, because it's hard to do that without
> introducing changes. In other words, don't use eval(parse()).
>
> Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
