> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:20 AM, R Stafford <rod.staff...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > But I have the extra condition that if E is true, then F must be false, and
> > vice versa,
Question: Does 'vice versa' mean
a) "if E is False, F must be True"
or
b) "if F is True, E must be False"?
... which are not the same.
b) (and mutual exclusivity in general) does not rule out the condition "E
False, F False", which would not be addressed by the
pass/fail equivalent equivalent of F <- !E
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
