Microsoft Word documents are inappropriate, and attachments almost always get stripped by the mailing list.
Please read the referenced information this time before trying again, and especially the Posting Guide. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On November 21, 2017 8:15:11 AM PST, yadav neog <yadavn...@gmail.com> wrote: >thank you for your valuable reply. I have attached my commands, >results, and >data with this mail..maybe it will be beneficial for you to feedback. > >On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Newmiller ><jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> >wrote: > >> Your example is incomplete... as the bottom of this and every post >says, >> we need to be able to proceed from an empty R environment to wherever >you >> are having the problem (reproducible), in as few steps as possible >> (minimal). The example needs to include data, preferably in R syntax >as the >> dput function creates... see the howtos referenced below for help >with >> that. [1], [2], [3] >> >> You also need to set your email program to send plain text format, >since >> HTML gets mangled to various degrees as it gets forced into text >format >> going through the mailing list. Read the Posting Guide. >> >> A wild guess is that you have negative values in your data or too few >data >> points... >> >> [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make- >> a-great-r-reproducible-example >> >> [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html >> >> [3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reprex/index.html (read >the >> vignette) >> -- >> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> On November 21, 2017 12:48:08 AM PST, yadav neog ><yadavn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >I am working on Johansen cointegration test, using urca and var >> >package. >> >in the selection of var, I have got following results. >> > >> >>VARselect(newd, lag.max = 10,type = "none") >> > >> >$selection >> >AIC(n) HQ(n) SC(n) FPE(n) >> > 6 6 6 5 >> > >> >$criteria >> > 1 2 3 4 >> > 5 6 7 8 9 >> >AIC(n) -3.818646e+01 -3.864064e+01 -3.833435e+01 -4.089169e+01 >> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf >> >HQ(n) -3.754345e+01 -3.744647e+01 -3.658903e+01 -3.859523e+01 >> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf >> >SC(n) -3.630096e+01 -3.513899e+01 -3.321655e+01 -3.415775e+01 >> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf >> >FPE(n) 2.700145e-17 2.114513e-17 5.350381e-17 2.035215e-17 >> >-9.147714e-65 0 0 0 0 >> > 10 >> >AIC(n) -Inf >> >HQ(n) -Inf >> >SC(n) -Inf >> >FPE(n) 0 >> > >> >Warning messages: >> >1: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced >> >2: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced >> >3: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced >> > >> >so do in my ca.jo test... I have found similar NaNs results. please >> >help me >> >in solving the problem. >> >Yadawananda Neog >> >Research Scholar >> >Department of Economics >> >Banaras Hindu University >> >Mob. 9838545073 >> > >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > >> >______________________________________________ >> >R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> >PLEASE do read the posting guide >> >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
