Hi Sarah,

Thank you for the response. But it is said in its description that after each 
run (sample), each observation in the whole dataset is assigned to the closest 
cluster. So how is it possible for one observation to be wrongly allocated, 
even with clara?

Behnam

Behnam



On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:48 AM -0800, "Sarah Goslee" 
<sarah.gos...@gmail.com<mailto:sarah.gos...@gmail.com>> wrote:

That means that points have been assigned to the wrong groups. This
may readily happen with a clustering method like cluster::clara() that
uses a subset of the data to cluster a dataset too large to analyze as
a unit. Negative silhouette numbers strongly suggest that your
clustering parameters should be changed.

Sarah

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:33 AM, ABABAEI, Behnam
<behnam.abab...@limagrain.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> We know that clustering methods in R assign observations to the closest 
> medoids. Hence, it is supposed to be the closest cluster each observation can 
> have. So, I wonder how it is possible to have negative values of silhouette , 
> while we are supposedly assign each observation to the closest cluster and 
> the formula in silhouette method cannot get negative?
>
>
> Behnam.
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to