> On 12 Dec 2015, at 10:54 , Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > My conclusion: Breaking such a fundamental lemma of logic as > "the empty set is always true"
Umm, that doesn't make sense to me. Surely you mean that "an AND-operation over an empty index set is TRUE"? A similar OR operation is FALSE, i.e. they behave like empty products and sums, respectively. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
