Thanks for the reply Don - that's the problem in a nutshell - I'll
repost on r-sig-geo....
Mark
On 10/12/15 20:46, MacQueen, Don wrote:
Appears to me that results for the third set of indices you supplied (1,1)
ended up in the third layer of the result. Similarly for the other sets of
indices. This makes sense to me.
r-sig-geo might be a better place to ask questions about the raster
package. I've seen other questions about stackApply there.
-Don
--
Mark Payne
Senior Researcher
Centre for Ocean Life
DTU Aqua
---------------------------------------
Technical University of Denmark
National Institute of Aquatic Resources
Charlottenlund Slot,
Jægersborg Allé 1
2920 Charlottenlund
Direct +45 35883422
m...@aqua.dtu.dk
http://www.aqua.dtu.dk/mpay
@MarkPayneAtWork
Skype: MarkPayneAtWork
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
