I highly recommend ?source. You can use source("clipboard") on windows, but creating complete files that define functions and feeding those complete files to source is a significant step in developing reproducible analyses. Whenever you find yourself pasting more than a couple of lines (one or two function calls) you should be making another function. However, even if you resist making functions you should be making a habit of sourcing complete files from disk rather than passing large chunks of code. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live... DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On October 29, 2015 8:16:17 AM MST, Victor Tian <tianx...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi there, > >Often times, I would run R in the terminal when the task is >computationally >intensive and a nice-looking UI is less desired. > >However, pasting a large chunk of code into the terminal often times >ends >up being messed up. In Python, the same problem would happen, however, >iPython provides a small functionality called magic word such as %paste >that can help paste the code neatly into the terminal. > >I'm wondering if there's a similar functionality in R. > >Thanks, ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.