Thanks Murdoch.
defining
plot.func<- function(x=x.init, y=y.init, arg3, arg4, "title", col, arg5)
and if plot doesn't take the exact parameters of plot.func but modified of
these parametersplot(x=x.pt,y=y.pt,xlim = c(0, 10), ylim = c(0,1), xlab=
"xlab", ylab="ylab", main = "title", col = col,type = "l")
then, how to define and invoke to be consisent?
Regards,
On Monday, October 19, 2015 7:45 PM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 19/10/2015 1:29 PM, carol white via R-help wrote:
> Hi,I have invoked plot in a function (plot.func) as follows but when I check
> the built package, I get a warning:
> plot(x.pt,y.pt,xlim = c(0, 10), ylim = c(0,1), xlab= "xlab", ylab="ylab",
> main = "title", col = col,type = "l")
> R CMD check my.package
> checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
> plot:
> function(x, ...)
> plot.func:
> function(x.pt, y.pt, arg3, arg4, "title", col, arg5)
>
> See section ‘Generic functions and methods’ in the ‘Writing R
> Extensions’ manual.
> Which plot argument is illegitimate or missing and how to eliminate the
> warning?
The first argument to plot.func needs to be called "x" if you want to
use it as a method. Method signatures need to be consistent with the
generic signature.
Duncan Murdoch
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
