On 26/08/15 10:59, Bert Gunter wrote: <SNIP>
Gratuitous Question born from personal frustration with such queries(so feel free to ignore): Why are you using (statistical) procedures that you do not understand? Of course the parameters for different treatments are "different"! -- but how and with what importance depends on the context in which you are working. Instead of fooling with cryptic statistical mumbo jumbo that invite misuse -- and which are probably valueless or idiotic anyway -- why don't you make some graphs and consider what they say in terms of the substantive issues at play? (Of course I know the answer -- it is because that is what your academic culture/journals demand. But therein lies the problem: what is demanded is junk).
Fortune nomination!!! cheers, Rolf Turner -- Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
