On 06/25/2015 11:18 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
The help page for prmatrix states that it only exists for backwards
compatability and
strongly hints at using print.matrix instead.
However, there does not seem to be a print.matrix() function.'
I asked this very same question here 18 months ago, but got no real
answer (except for a reference to 'write.matrix' (MASS) from David
Winsemius). However, googling found the following:
--------------------------------
Updating packages for 1.7.0:
....
print.matrix() only exists for backwards compatibility: it is the same
as print.default(). Very likely print.matrix was used for the
right=TRUE argument that S's print.default does not have, but this is
unnecessary. If you want the call sequence of print.matrix, use
prmatrix instead. Also, note that print prints the attributes of the
matrix whereas prmatrix does not.
------------------------------
http://developer.r-project.org/170update.txt
So, my guess is that print.matrix once existed but is now silently gone.
Use print.default.
Göran
The help page for print mentions a zero.print option, but that does not appear
to affect
matrices. This (or something like it) is what I was looking for.
Am I overlooking something?
Terry Therneau
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
