> Does the difference have something to do with ggplot() using ranges > derived from the data? > When I modify my original 'test' dataframe with two extra rows as > defined below, I get expected results in both versions.
Order shouldn't matter - and if it's making a difference, that's a bug. But I'm still not completely sure what you're expecting. > This highlights my next question (warned you ;-) ), I have been > unsuccessful in trying to define fixed plotting ranges to generate a > 'template' graphic that I may reuse with successive 'overstory plot' > data sets. I have used '+ xlim(0, 360) + ylim(0, 16)' but, this seems to > not have any effect on the final plot layout. Could you please produce a small reproducible example that demonstrates this? It may well be a bug. Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
