I took a look at apparent gender among list participants a few years ago: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-June/280272.html
Same general thing: very few regular participants on the list were women. I don't see any sign that that has changed in the last three years. The bar to participation in the R-help list is much, much lower than that to become a developer. It would be interesting to look at the stats for CRAN packages as well. The very low percentage of regular female participants is one of the things that keeps me active on this list: to demonstrate that it's not only men who use R and participate in the community. (If you decide to do the stats for 2014, be aware that I've been out on medical leave for the past two months, so the numbers are even lower than usual.) Sarah On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Maarten Blaauw <maarten.bla...@qub.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi there, > > I can't help to notice that the gender balance among R developers and > ordinary members is extremely skewed (as it is with open source software in > general). > > Have a look at http://www.r-project.org/foundation/memberlist.html - at most > a handful of women are listed among the 'supporting members', and none at > all among the 29 'ordinary members'. > > On the other hand I personally know many happy R users of both genders. > > My questions are thus: Should R developers (and users) be worried that the > 'other half' is excluded? If so, how could female R users/developers be > persuaded to become more visible (e.g. added as supporting or ordinary > members)? > > Thanks, > > Maarten > -- Sarah Goslee http://www.functionaldiversity.org ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.