Sorry for the trouble with double posting: I never received my original message through the mailing list so I assumed that it did not go through.
I’ll try your suggestions, thank you. Mikhail. > On Nov 14, 2014, at 12:04, Jeff Newmiller <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > Repeating yourself verbatim is poor form. At least quote your previous > message and indicate that this is a reprise. > > While I doubt that my opinion is universal, I think that mixing C and R in > the same file is already living on the edge of good practice. You are > assuming that all of your nodes have the infrastructure to compile your code > on the fly, which is something you have to insure for each node in your > facilities. A less convenient but more conventional approach is to create > your own support package(s) that contain the compiled portions of your code > and distribute them prior to running your application. > > However, this conversation might be more productive if conducted between you > and the maintainer of the inline package (see ?maintainer) or on the R-devel > list because it is outside the R language. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live... > DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... > Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing > Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with > /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On November 14, 2014 7:42:01 AM PST, Mikhail Umorin <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello — >> >> I am using inline C functions within foreach %dopar% loop. On SMP >> (doParallel, doMP) it works but on MPI-based clusters (doMPI) it >> does’t. The reason, I think, is because the object code produced using >> the inline package, essentially an .so file, does not get copied onto >> the worker nodes when they are spawned using startMPIcluster(). >> >> Does anyone have any ideas on how I can send the object code to the >> workers and re-link it to the inline functions, or some other way? I >> know that I can define the inline functions within the foreach loop but >> it is very limiting and does not look pretty when you have a lot of >> functions to define. So, is there I way that follows a good programming >> style? >> >> I would prefer to do it from within the R script and use the “spawning” >> mode to paralellize. >> >> Thank you for your time, >> >> Mikhail. >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
