Hi all: I have had recent issues with citing a package(s) in journals. I have a package that has been cited as the Documentation and accepted into journals, but I just had a problem with the lme4 package. We are citing the submitted paper instead of the documentation. In other words, the citation from the citation function was not acceptable to the editor.
Experiences? Thoughts for a solution? Are there standard ways of doing this? Maybe the R Foundation could publish a manual of which all package documentation is a sub-publication kind of like an edited book? I just am trying to make sure that everyone that makes the R ecosystem so useful gets attribution for their work. Many thanks to everyone involved. -- Stephen Sefick ************************************************** Auburn University Biological Sciences 331 Funchess Hall Auburn, Alabama 36849 ************************************************** sas0...@auburn.edu http://www.auburn.edu/~sas0025 ************************************************** Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the annoying little problems of being mammals. -K. Mullis "A big computer, a complex algorithm and a long time does not equal science." -Robert Gentleman [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
