Hello Henric,

Thank you so much for the detailed responses and helpful information.  Much
appreciated.

Regards

Janh


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Henric Winell <nilsson.hen...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Janh,
>
> Janh Anni skrev 2013-06-01 19:47:
>
>  Hello All,
>> Thanks a lot for the helpful suggestions.  I wonder how ties are handled
>> for the rank sum test by wilcox_test and wilcox.exact?  For instance,
>>
>
> Ties handling was mainly a problem back in the day when recursion formulas
> were used for the computation of exact p-values.  (When no ties are
> present, the form of the exact null distribution of the Wilcoxon rank-sum
> statistic depends only on the total number of observations in the two
> groups.)
>
>
>  other software such as Minitab correct for ties by adjusting the
>> variance of the test statistic, and actually provide the p values before
>> and after adjustment for ties.
>>
>
> Adjusting the variance only matters when approximating the exact
> distribution with its asymptotic Gaussian distribution.  And only when at
> least one tie is shared between the two groups.  And yes, the standardized
> statistic in 'coin' accounts for ties.  If ties are present, why would you
> want to know the unadjusted p-value?
>
>
>  IIf neither wilcox_test nor wilcox.exact
>> expressly corrects for ties in the Wilcoxon rank sum test, then perhaps
>> one should just use the conventional wilcox.test which is the simplest
>>
> > of them all?  Thanks again
>
> If this was true, the 'wilcox.exact' function would be completely
> pointless since 'wilcox.test' just falls back on the asymptotic
> approximation when ties are present.
>
> Software like 'StatXact', 'exactRankTests', and 'coin' use algorithms that
> compute the exact p-value for any ties configuration.  Take a look at
> Torsten Hothorn's "On Exact Rank Tests in R" article from the very first
> issue of R News 
> http://www.r-project.org/doc/**Rnews/Rnews_2001-1.pdf<http://www.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2001-1.pdf>
> .
>
>
> Henric
>
>
>
>  Janh
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Henric Winell <nilsson.hen...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:nilsson.henric@gmail.**com <nilsson.hen...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>     Janh,
>>
>>     Janh Anni skrev 2013-06-01 04:27:
>>
>>         Hello peter,
>>
>>
>>         Thanks for the comment.  wilcox.exact is simpler as you pointed
>>         out but the
>>         fact that it is no longer being developed is somewhat concerning.
>>
>>
>>     Admittedly, 'coin' is being actively developed and has a lot more
>>     bells and whistles.  But for something as simple as this, that
>>     wouldn't bother me at all.  In any case, the 'exactRankTests'
>>     package still gets bug fixes and the algorithm used in the Wilcoxon
>>     case is exactly the same for both packages.
>>
>>     However, if you want to stay with 'coin' you can just wrap up Greg's
>>     proposal in a function:
>>
>>     wilcox_test.default <- function(x, y, ...) {
>>          data <-
>>              data.frame(values = c(x, y),
>>                         group = rep(c("x", "y"), c(length(x), length(y))))
>>          wilcox_test(values ~ group, data = data, ...)
>>     }
>>
>>     Assuming that both 'coin' and 'exactRankTests are loaded, we can now
>>     check that it works:
>>
>>      > set.seed(123)
>>      > x <- rpois(10, 3)
>>      > y <- rpois(11, 3.1)
>>      >
>>      > wilcox_test(x, y, alternative = "less", distribution = "exact")
>>
>>              Exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test
>>
>>     data:  values by group (x, y)
>>     Z = -0.0715, p-value = 0.4844
>>     alternative hypothesis: true mu is less than 0
>>
>>      > wilcox.exact(x, y, alternative = "less")
>>
>>              Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test
>>
>>     data:  x and y
>>     W = 54, p-value = 0.4844
>>     alternative hypothesis: true mu is less than 0
>>
>>
>>     HTH,
>>     Henric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         Regards
>>         Janh
>>
>>
>>         On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Peter Ehlers
>>         <ehl...@ucalgary.ca <mailto:ehl...@ucalgary.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>             On 2013-05-30 20:20, Janh Anni wrote:
>>
>>                 Hello Greg,
>>
>>                 Thank you so much for your kind assistance.  It looks
>>                 like there's no way
>>                 around using the formula format.  I longed in vain for a
>>                 simpler script
>>                 more like the wilcox.test format.  Thanks again.
>>
>>                 Janh
>>
>>
>>             I don't see why the formula syntax would be a problem, but
>>             to avoid it
>>             you could use exactRankTests::wilcox.exact() which, I
>>             believe, was
>>             written by the same author. It uses the same syntax as
>>             wilcox.test().
>>             Note, though, that the package is no longer
>>             being developed.
>>
>>             Peter Ehlers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Greg Snow
>>                 <538...@gmail.com <mailto:538...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                    Ok, it looks like the function mainly works through
>>                 the formula syntax.
>>
>>                         It still would have been nice to have a
>>                     reproducible example of what
>>                     your
>>                     data may look like, but I can show an example with
>>                     simulated x and y:
>>
>>                        x <- rpois(10, 3)
>>
>>                         y <- rpois(11, 3.1)
>>                         mydf <- data.frame( vals = c(x,y),
>>
>>                     +   group=rep( c('x','y'), c( length(x), length(y) )
>> ) )
>>
>>                         wilcox_test( vals ~ group, data=mydf )
>>
>>
>>                                Asymptotic Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test
>>
>>                     data:  vals by group (x, y)
>>                     Z = -1.3718, p-value = 0.1701
>>                     alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0
>>
>>                     Does that help?  (maybe I am the heedlessness
>>                     theorist after all)
>>
>>
>>
>>                     On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Janh Anni
>>                     <annij...@gmail.com <mailto:annij...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>                        I thought (hoped) wilcox_test(x,y) would do it
>>                     but it doesn't and the
>>
>>                         package maintainer says the data have to be
>>                         rearranged but does not
>>                         specify
>>                         how.  Thanks
>>
>>                         Janh
>>
>>
>>
>>                         On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Greg Snow
>>                         <538...@gmail.com <mailto:538...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>                            What have you tried so far?  Have you read
>>                         the help page? have you run
>>
>>                             the examples on that page?
>>
>>                             I would expect that it is something as simple
>> as
>>
>>                             library(coin)
>>                             wilcox_test(x,y)
>>
>>                             or
>>
>>                             wilcox_test( y ~ group )
>>
>>                             But you should trust the help page more than
>>                             the expectations of
>>                             someone
>>                             who has not read it recently (see
>> fortune(14)).
>>
>>                             If that does not answer your question then
>>                             give us more detail on what
>>                             you tried, what you expected the results to
>>                             be, what the results
>>                             actually
>>                             were, and how they differed.  Without that
>>                             information we have to
>>                             resort to
>>                             mind reading and the current implementation
>>                             of the esp package is still
>>                             very pre-alpha, it suggests that the answer
>>                             to your question is:
>>
>>                                esp()
>>
>>
>>                             [1] "selflessly vigilantly pigeon theorist
>>                             heedlessness"
>>
>>                             Which is either much to profound for the
>>                             likes of me to understand or
>>                             is
>>                             complete gibberish (which is only slightly
>>                             less helpful than an overly
>>                             general question without a reproducible
>>                             example).
>>
>>
>>                             On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Janh Anni
>>                             <annij...@gmail.com
>>                             <mailto:annij...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                                Dear All,
>>
>>
>>                                 I have two simple data samples (no
>>                                 groups or factors, etc.) and would
>>                                 just
>>                                 like to compute the two-sample Wilcoxon
>>                                 Rank Sum test using the
>>                                 wilcox_test
>>                                 function contained in the coin package,
>>                                 which is reportedly better
>>                                 than
>>                                 the
>>                                 regular wilcox.test function because it
>>                                 performs some adjustment for
>>                                 ties.
>>                                 Would anyone know how to craft a script
>>                                 to perform this task?  Much
>>                                 appreciated.
>>
>>                                 Janh
>>
>>                                            [[alternative HTML version
>>                                 deleted]]
>>
>>                                 ______________________________**
>> __**________________
>>                                 R-help@r-project.org
>>                                 <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing
>> list
>>                                 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/***
>> __*listinfo/r-help <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/*__*listinfo/r-help>
>>                                 <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**
>> **listinfo/r-help <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help>><
>> https://**stat__ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-__help<https://stat__ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-__help>
>>
>>                                 <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**
>> listinfo/r-help <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>>>
>>
>>                                 PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>                                 http://www.R-project.org/**__**
>> posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/**__posting-guide.html>
>>                                 <http://www.R-project.org/****
>> posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/**posting-guide.html>><
>> http://**www. <http://www.>__R-project.org/posting-**guide.__html
>>
>>                                 <http://www.R-project.org/**
>> posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>>>
>>
>>                                 and provide commented, minimal,
>>                                 self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                             --
>>                             Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
>>                             538...@gmail.com <mailto:538...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     --
>>                     Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
>>                     538...@gmail.com <mailto:538...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>                           [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>>                 ______________________________**__**________________
>>                 R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org>
>>                 mailing list
>>                 
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/***__*listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/*__*listinfo/r-help>
>>                 
>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/****listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help>
>> ><https://**stat__ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-__help<https://stat__ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-__help>
>>
>>                 
>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
>> >>
>>                 PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/**
>>                 posting-guide.html
>>                 
>> <http://www.R-project.org/__**posting-guide.html<http://www.R-project.org/__posting-guide.html>
>>
>>                 
>> <http://www.R-project.org/**posting-guide.html<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
>> >>
>>
>>                 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained,
>>                 reproducible code.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>>         ______________________________**__________________
>>         R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list
>>         
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/_**_listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/__listinfo/r-help>
>>
>>         
>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
>> >
>>         PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>         
>> http://www.R-project.org/__**posting-guide.html<http://www.R-project.org/__posting-guide.html>
>>
>>         
>> <http://www.R-project.org/**posting-guide.html<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
>> >
>>         and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to