> Other people have recommended Roxygen, but honestly I haven't seen a package
> documented with Roxygen where the documentation was adequate.
> It looks as though it's great to get initial documentation created, but does
> not appear to encourage followup.

I don't think that's a problem with roxygen - I think that's the key
difficult of writing documentation.  Personally, I find it much easier
to keep roxygen documentation up-to-date than with separate Rd files,
because when I'm modifying the function, the documentation is right
there, reminding me to update it.

Hadley

-- 
Chief Scientist, RStudio
http://had.co.nz/

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to