On Nov 20, 2012, at 19:45 , Jeff Newmiller wrote: > a) I would advocate marking "<<-" as "not recommended". Anyone who needs this > reference probably should avoid this operator.
Could we say "not for beginners"? I mean, it has legitimate uses. If we say "not recommended", people will remember it as non-beginners and avoid it, even when it is exactly the right thing to do. Also, the text could be "left assignment in outer lexical scope" to avoid the somewhat vacuous reference to "the environments". Also on pkg::foo(), I'd say "not usually required" or "only needed if two packages contain the same function". -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
