thnx sarah!!!thnx for saving my time
regardseliza

> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:44:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: [R] reversing distance matrix for original values
> From: sarah.gos...@gmail.com
> To: eliza_bo...@hotmail.com
> CC: r-help@r-project.org
> 
> Hi Eliza,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, eliza botto <eliza_bo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > dear useRs,
> > i created a distance matrix, of certain voltage values. unfortunately, i 
> > lost the original values. i am only left with the distance matrix that i 
> > created from those values. i wanted to ask that is there a way in R to 
> > reverse distance matrix for the original values?
> 
> There is not, and a bit of thought will tell you why.
> 
> Say you used Euclidean distance as your metric, and only had one variable.
> 
> For a distance of 2, the original data could be:
> dist(c(10, 12))
> dist(c(5, 7))
> dist(c(7, 5))
> dist(c(1, 3))
> dist(c(100000, 100002))
> dist(c(2, 4))
> dist(c(2.1, 4.1))
> dist(c(2.2, 4.2))
> 
> and so on. Even with known bounds on your voltage values, there are an
> infinite number of equivalent solutions. I suppose you could try to
> treat it as a system of X equations and X unknowns and find possible
> solutions, but that doesn't get you back your original data.
> 
> Sarah
> --
> Sarah Goslee
> http://www.functionaldiversity.org
                                          
        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to