Hi David,
this looks very promising, but I am afraid I can't see clearly how this would
work.
If possible, would you mind a short explanation? perhaps using the attached
exampled?
Thank you for your advice,
Sebastian
On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:16 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Sebastian Barfort wrote:
>
>> I am also interested in the standard errors, but beneath not next to the
>> point estimates which is standard in the xtable package.
>
> Last year Mark Difford offered code to do that.
> From: Mark Difford <mark_diff...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [R] Latex Table Help on R
> Date: July 21, 2011 12:55:02 AM PDT
> To: r-help@R-project.org help <r-help@r-project.org>
> #------------------
>> However, I would like the standard deviations under the means in brackets.
>> Can anyone check this code to see how this can be adjusted?
>
> Jim,
>
> You need to use "underset," a LaTeX command. The bare-bones call is
> $\underset{}{}$, where the underset value goes in the first curly and your
> main value goes in the second curly (i.e. is typeset above the underset).
>
> I don't use xtable but rather use [Ron:sic] Harrell's functions in Hmisc
> package,
> then pass it through his latex() function, so can't take you further.
>
> ##
> paste('$\\underset','{',data$SDs,'}','{',data$means,'}$', sep="")
> #------------------
>
>
> I sent Mark a correction at the time because it is Frank Harrell's package
> ... not Ron.
>
> Frank's web page on literate program can be very useful.
> http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/StatReport
>
>> If you by any chance remember the name of the package or how to do it that
>> would be much appreciated!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Duncan Mackay <mac...@northnet.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> If you just want the coefficients.
>>>
>>> xtable(summary(fe)$coef)
>>> % latex table generated in R 2.15.1 by xtable 1.7-0 package
>>> % Thu Oct 11 09:04:59 2012
>>> \begin{table}[ht]
>>> \begin{center}
>>> \begin{tabular}{rrrrr}
>>> \hline
>>> & Estimate & Std. Error & t-value & Pr($>$$|$t$|$) \\
>>> \hline
>>> x & 0.12 & 0.07 & 1.78 & 0.08 \\
>>> \hline
>>> \end{tabular}
>>> \end{center}
>>> \end{table}
>>>
>>> There is another package whose name eludes me which may help for tables
>>> which have different outputs to the output of lm etc
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Duncan
>>>
>>> Duncan Mackay
>>> Department of Agronomy and Soil Science
>>> University of New England
>>> Armidale NSW 2351
>>> Email: home: mac...@northnet.com.au
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 05:09 11/10/2012, you wrote:
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>> May be you can use library(texreg):
>>>>
>>>> library(plm)
>>>>
>>>> #generating some data
>>>> x <- rnorm(270)
>>>> y <- rnorm(270)
>>>> t <- rep(1:3,30)
>>>> i <- rep(1:90, each=3)
>>>>
>>>> data <- data.frame(i,t,x,y)
>>>>
>>>> fe <- plm(y~x,data=data,model="within")
>>>> summary(fe)
>>>> library(texreg)
>>>> fe1<-extract.plm(fe) #extract the plm object
>>>>
>>>> library(xtable)
>>>>
>>>> xtable(do.call(rbind,lapply(fe1,function(x) data.frame(x))))
>>>> % latex table generated in R 2.15.0 by xtable 1.7-0 package
>>>> % Wed Oct 10 14:59:10 2012
>>>> \begin{table}[ht]
>>>> \begin{center}
>>>> \begin{tabular}{rr}
>>>> \hline
>>>> & x \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> Estimate & -0.03 \\
>>>> Std. Error & 0.08 \\
>>>> Pr($>$$|$t$|$) & 0.68 \\
>>>> R\$\verb|^|2\$ & 0.00 \\
>>>> Adj. R\$\verb|^|2\$ & 0.00 \\
>>>> Num. obs. & 270.00 \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> \end{tabular}
>>>> \end{center}
>>>> \end{table}
>>>> #Another example. In this case, you can create two tables from the zz1
>>>> list
>>>> data("Produc", package = "plm")
>>>> zz <- plm(log(gsp) ~ log(pcap) + log(pc) + log(emp) + unemp, data =
>>>> Produc, index = c("state","year"))
>>>> zz1<-extract.plm(zz)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lapply(lapply(zz1,function(x) data.frame(x)),xtable)
>>>> [[1]]
>>>> % latex table generated in R 2.15.0 by xtable 1.7-0 package
>>>> % Wed Oct 10 15:08:02 2012
>>>> \begin{table}[ht]
>>>> \begin{center}
>>>> \begin{tabular}{rrrr}
>>>> \hline
>>>> & Estimate & Std..Error & Pr...t.. \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> log(pcap) & -0.03 & 0.03 & 0.37 \\
>>>> log(pc) & 0.29 & 0.03 & 0.00 \\
>>>> log(emp) & 0.77 & 0.03 & 0.00 \\
>>>> unemp & -0.01 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> \end{tabular}
>>>> \end{center}
>>>> \end{table}
>>>>
>>>> [[2]]
>>>> % latex table generated in R 2.15.0 by xtable 1.7-0 package
>>>> % Wed Oct 10 15:08:02 2012
>>>> \begin{table}[ht]
>>>> \begin{center}
>>>> \begin{tabular}{rr}
>>>> \hline
>>>> & x \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> R\$\verb|^|2\$ & 0.94 \\
>>>> Adj. R\$\verb|^|2\$ & 0.88 \\
>>>> Num. obs. & 816.00 \\
>>>> \hline
>>>> \end{tabular}
>>>> \end{center}
>>>> \end{table}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hope it helps.
>>>>
>>>> A.K.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Sebastian Barfort <sb3...@nyu.edu>
>>>> To: r-help@r-project.org
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:07 PM
>>>> Subject: [R] Exporting summary plm results to latex
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to export my fixed effect results to Latex. I am using the plm
>>>> package with the summary function. However, it does not look like
>>>> apsrtable, stargazer, or any other package can accompany using the plm
>>>> package.
>>>>
>>>> I am interested in a classic table with the coefficient in one row
>>>> followed by the standard error in paranthesis in the next row and stars by
>>>> the coefficient to show relevant coefficient level.
>>>>
>>>> coefficient 1 xxx**
>>>> (xxx)
>>>>
>>>> Here is a reproducible example:
>>>>
>>>> library(plm)
>>>>
>>>> #generating some data
>>>> x <- rnorm(270)
>>>> y <- rnorm(270)
>>>> t <- rep(1:3,30)
>>>> i <- rep(1:90, each=3)
>>>>
>>>> data <- data.frame(i,t,x,y)
>>>>
>>>> fe <- plm(y~x,data=data,model="within")
>>>> summary(fe)
>>>>
>>>> If there is an alternative to using the plm package that works with any of
>>>> the export to latex packages, I would be very interested to know.
>>>> Otherwise, any ideas of how to solve this problem are very welcome. I
>>>> almost exclusively use fixed effect panel models, and the problem of
>>>> exporting results to Latex is one of the things preventing me from
>>>> switching entirely from Stata to R.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> David Winsemius, MD
> Alameda, CA, USA
>
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
