Thanks for your response. First time posting on any R forum, and apparently I didn't read carefully enough to see the difference in my model. I much appreciate the quick response.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:16 AM, David Winsemius [via R] < ml-node+s789695n4642723...@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 5:59 PM, semperparatus wrote: > > > I want to change it because I don't want to compare in this instance > between > > conditions, but I simply want to see the contrast t-statistic between > > patient and control at every level of condition (1, 2, and 3). > > > >> From there I'd like to be able to plot the t-statistic for the contrast > > between patient and control at level 1 of conditon, level 2 of > condition, > > and level 3 of condition, each with error bars. > > > > In the post I responded to the output gave fixed effect output for > > SecA:Fir1, SecB:Fir1, SecC:Fir1, and SecD:Fir1. I'm hoping to get the > same > > sort of output but for mine it would be Cond1:Patient1, Cond2:Patient1, > > Cond3:Patient1. > > It does not appear that you have the same situation as was being discussed > earlier: > > Yours was: > > ' *When I tried using the syntax you used with my model: > lmer(H.y. ~ patient*stance*cond +(cond/patient) + (1|subj), data=H), I > got this > result, which seems to be using condition 1 as a part of the baseline. Any > idea how to change that?*' > > The other was: > > test <- lmer(Latency ~ (Nuisance1*Nuisance2) + (Sec/Fir) + (1|Subject) + > (1|Item), datatotest) > > He had separated his nuisance parameters from the 2 variables (Sec and > Fir) for which he was interested in examining contrasts. > > PLEASE learn to include context. > > > > -- > David Winsemius, MD > Alameda, CA, USA > > ______________________________________________ > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4642723&i=0>mailing > list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Contrasts-for-2x4-interaction-in-mixed-effects-model-tp4642536p4642723.html > To unsubscribe from Contrasts for 2x4 interaction in mixed effects model, > click > here<http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4642536&code=cm9iZTA4OTlAdW1uLmVkdXw0NjQyNTM2fC0xMzAwMTcwNDQy> > . > NAML<http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Contrasts-for-2x4-interaction-in-mixed-effects-model-tp4642536p4642724.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
