On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:50 PM, R. Michael Weylandt <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jennifer Sabatier > <plessthanpointohf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> No, I never use attach(), exactly for the reasons you state. To do >> due diligence I did a search of code for the function and it didn't >> come up (I would have been shocked because I never us it!). >> >> Now that real data is up, does your suggestion still apply? I am >> reading it now. >> > > If you mean the data you sent to Peter, it got scrubbed by the list > servers as well (they are somewhat draconian, but appropriately so in > the long run). The absolute best way to send R data via email (esp on > this list) is to use the dput() function which will create a plain > text representation of your data _exactly_ as R sees it. It's a little > hard for the untrained eye to parse (I can usually get about 90% of > what it all means but there's some stuff with rownames = NA I've never > looked into) but it's perfectly reproducible to a different R session. > Then us having the same data is a simple copy+paste away.
Note that the dput() output is to be put into the body of the email, not in an attachment or we're back where we started ;-) M > > For more on dput() and reproducibility generally, see > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example > > It could be the floating point thing (it's hard to say without knowing > how your data was calculated), but Rui seems to think not. > > M > >> Thanks, >> >> Jen >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:38 PM, R. Michael Weylandt >> <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Off the wall / wild guess, do you use attach() frequently? Not >>> entirely sure how it would come up, but it tends to make weird errors >>> like this occur. >>> >>> M >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jennifer Sabatier >>> <plessthanpointohf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Rui, >>>> >>>> Thanks so much for responding but I think with my HTML problem the vn >>>> data you made must not be the same. I tried running your code on the >>>> data (I uploaded a copy) and I got the same thing I had before. >>>> >>>> Jen >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Rui Barradas <ruipbarra...@sapo.pt> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 165114 1 0 0 0 0 417313 1 0 3546 1 0 4613 1 0 225460 1 0 6417 1 1 >>>>> 23 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
