Dear R community,
I'm trying to analyze a model with an ordinal response variable.
I wonder if clm()s (Cumulative Link Models) are appropriate in my case.
The study compares parasite infestation of porpoises in 1995 and 2009. The
degree of infestation is a rank (mild to severe, as ordered factor). In some
parasite species clm gives meaningful results. But in one case I started to
wonder. In the first study (1995) zero animals were infested by this parasite.
In 2009 most animals were, some of which severely. I have two more factors,
thus I was happy finding the package - ordinal.
Using a simple Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square test I find a strong sigificant
year term. Also lm, assuming normal distribution, finds significant year (and
age) term. But in clm I find no significance. Does clm have a problem with one
factor level being zero? I have compared the log-likelihood of the link
functions and the cauchit gave the highest results. Here is the r code:
model<-clm(factor(Parasite,ordered = is.ordered(0:3))~
Study*Age*Sex,link=c("cauchit"))
summary(model)
Thanks in advance,
Katrin
Institute of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife
Hannover-Büsum
Germany
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
