Hmmm an 'objective' assessment? Maybe. But it looks to me that some commercial enterprise paid for this study as a means to argue against the use of R in favor of a commercial package
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, R. Michael Weylandt < michael.weyla...@gmail.com> <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/pubs/ecoop12.pdf > > A new paper out on R the language -- I'm not all the way through it but > it's been an interesting read so far. Thought it might be of interest to > the list. > > Michael Weylandt > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Thomas E Adams National Weather Service Ohio River Forecast Center 1901 South State Route 134 Wilmington, OH 45177 EMAIL: thomas.ad...@noaa.gov VOICE: 937-383-0528 FAX: 937-383-0033 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
