Hmmm… an 'objective' assessment? Maybe. But it looks to me that some
commercial enterprise paid for this study as a means to argue against the
use of R in favor of a commercial package…

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, R. Michael Weylandt <
michael.weyla...@gmail.com> <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/pubs/ecoop12.pdf
>
> A new paper out on R the language -- I'm not all the way through it but
> it's been an interesting read so far. Thought it might be of interest to
> the list.
>
> Michael Weylandt
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



-- 

Thomas E Adams
National Weather Service
Ohio River Forecast Center
1901 South State Route 134
Wilmington, OH 45177

EMAIL:  thomas.ad...@noaa.gov
VOICE:  937-383-0528
FAX:    937-383-0033

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to