On 12-01-14 06:00 AM, r-help-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:09:09 -0800 (PST)
From: statquant2<statqu...@gmail.com>
To:r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] simulating stable VAR process
Message-ID:<1326449349804-4291835.p...@n4.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello Paul
Thanks for the answer but my point is not how to simulate a VAR(p) process
and check that it is stable.
My question is more how can I generate a VAR(p) such that I already know
that it is stable.
Just to be clear, my answer was telling you how to check that the model
is stable, not how to simulate a process and check if the process is
stationary, which is probably what you mean when you say stable process.
Beware that the terminology "stable model" is often used nowadays to
refer to whether the parameters are changing over time. This has little
to do with whether the model is stable in the sense of the modulus of
the determinant of the polynomial. Elsewhere in this thread, I think
John Frain has given you an algorithm for generating models.
We know a condition that assure that it is stable (see first message) but
this is not a condition on coefficients etc...
Yes, it is a condition on coefficients.
What I want is
generate say a 1000 random VAR(3) processes over say 500 time periods that
will be STABLE (meaning If I run stability() all will pass the test)
I am a bit confused by what you mean here. If you are saying "generate
500 time periods for each of the 1000 models", you do not have to
generate any time periods unless you want simulated data, you can check
if the models are stable directly, because this is a check on the
coefficients of the model. [If you are saying that the model is changing
over time, then the models may all individually be stable in the
determinant sense, but this is not stable (by construction) in the
second sense above. And, the generated process will probably not be
stationary according to many of the usual definitions.]
When I try to do that it seems that none of the VAR I am generating pass
this test, so I assume that the class of stable VAR(p) is very small
compared to the whole VAR(p) process.
When you say "small" I think you are talking about a measure on the
space of coefficients. If you use the usual metric and generated the
coefficients uniformly randomly over R^n, then the models that have
determinant inside the unit ball would probably be a very small set.
Even with considerable restrictions, say for example, the coefficients
all between -1 and 1, I think the stable models would be a small set.
HTH,
Paul
--
View this message in
context:http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/simulating-stable-VAR-process-tp4261177p4291835.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
