On 12/12/2011 10:39 AM, Alexander wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to write a script to analyse R scripts, which contain only
> functions. Therefor, I want to test the R script if it contains onyl correct
> code. Is there a nicer and more efficent function than
>
> test <- try(source("someRscript"))
> if(class(test) == "try-error"){
> print("Not executable")
> }
>
> ?
>
> Another question : Does a package exist to analyse functions? For example to
> get all defined function names, argument, nestings, etc...
> Does a package exists which creates a flowchart of a script which contains a
> sequel of functions?
>
> Thank you
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Script-analysing-tp4185492p4185492.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
...which is one of the first hits on google when googling for "R analyse
code".
Paul
--
Paul Hiemstra, Ph.D.
Global Climate Division
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)
Wilhelminalaan 10 | 3732 GK | De Bilt | Kamer B 3.39
P.O. Box 201 | 3730 AE | De Bilt
tel: +31 30 2206 494
http://intamap.geo.uu.nl/~paul
http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/paul-hiemstra/20/30b/770
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
