Terry will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the
answer to this question is specific to the coxph function.
For all the [well-written] formula-based modelling functions
(essentially, those that call model.frame and model.matrix to interpret
the formula) the option "contrasts" controls how factor
variables are parameterized in the model matrix. contr.treatment
makes the baseline the first factor level, contr.SAS makes
the baseline the last, contr.sum makes the baseline the mean,
etc. E.g.,
> df <- data.frame(time=sin(1:20)+2,
cens=rep(c(0,0,1), len=20),
var1=factor(rep(0:1, each=10)),
var2=factor(rep(0:1, 10)))
> options(contrasts=c("contr.treatment", "contr.treatment"))
> coxph(Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data=df)
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data = df)
coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p
var11 0.1640 1.18 0.822 0.1995 0.84
var21 0.0806 1.08 0.830 0.0971 0.92
Likelihood ratio test=0.05 on 2 df, p=0.974 n= 20, number of events= 6
> options(contrasts=c("contr.SAS", "contr.SAS"))
> coxph(Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data=df)
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data = df)
coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p
var10 -0.1640 0.849 0.822 -0.1995 0.84
var20 -0.0806 0.923 0.830 -0.0971 0.92
Likelihood ratio test=0.05 on 2 df, p=0.974 n= 20, number of events= 6
> options(contrasts=c("contr.sum", "contr.sum"))
> coxph(Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data=df)
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(time, cens) ~ var1 + var2, data = df)
coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p
var11 -0.0820 0.921 0.411 -0.1995 0.84
var21 -0.0403 0.960 0.415 -0.0971 0.92
Likelihood ratio test=0.05 on 2 df, p=0.974 n= 20, number of events= 6
(lm() has a contrasts argument that can override getOption("contrasts")
and set different contrasts for each variable but coxph() does not have
that argument.)
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf Of David Winsemius
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 9:36 AM
> To: a.schlic...@nki.nl
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] What's the baseline model when using coxph with factor
> variables?
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Andreas Schlicker wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to fit a Cox regression model with two factor variables
> > but have some problems with the interpretation of the results.
> > Considering the following model, where var1 and var2 can assume
> > value 0 and 1:
> >
> > coxph(Surv(time, cens) ~ factor(var1) * factor(var2), data=temp)
> >
> > What is the baseline model? Is that considering the whole population
> > or the case when both var1 and var2 = 0?
>
> This has been discussed several times in the past on rhelp. My
> suggestion would be to search your favorite rhelp archive using
> "baseline hazard Therneau", since Terry Therneau is the author of
> survival. (The answer is closer to the first than to the second.)
>
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > andi
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> David Winsemius, MD
> West Hartford, CT
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
