On 04/10/2011 7:04 AM, S Ellison wrote:
See para 10.3.2 'Identifiers' in the R language definition (always distributed
with R in the html help system), or ?make.names, for a concise statement of
what constitutes a valid variable name in R.
It's actually underscores that might give trouble with older versions, not '.'.
But they'd have to be a lot older by R standards (pre 1.9.0).
I am not sure why there has been a recent shift away from periods and towards
camelCase in some R packages;
Presumably the authors of those packages prefer camelCase. I don't
think it's any more complicated than that.
Duncan Murdoch
personally I find a period or underscore much more useful for making a variable
name readable. And a mix of camelCase and period.breaks makes it a lot harder
to guess which case-sensitive string to use. The number of different
combinations of case and period I end up trying for R.Version (occasionally
used, never quite often enought to be automatic) defies belief ;-).
S Ellison
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org On Behalf Of Smart Guy
> Sent: 04 October 2011 05:20
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] The use of period in function names and variable names
>
> Hi,
> I am looking for some guidance on whether I can use the
> period(.) in function names and variable names.
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
