On 26.08.2011 20:27, . wrote:
Hi Ravi,
are you saying to apply the idea of a trapezoidal method "again", because I
was expecting the integrate() already do it for me. Is not the case?
I am also dealing with troubles related to integrate. Just to say, I tried
to figure out the problem in Mathematica and it gives me the
expected/correct solution.
I am integrating a function with shape like a exp(x), x>0. The value of the
function get lower when x is big but integrate return zero.
If some one can give a suggestion, it will be very appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/integration-tp843252p3771660.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
So you never read the posting guide, ".", did you? Please do so!
Please specify reproducible examples!
Please quote the original messages from the thread you are replying to.
Note this is a mailing list you are obviously misusing via Nabble.
If you want to contact Ravi, write also to Ravi and not only to the
mailing list R-help!
Uwe Ligges
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
