Dear Uwe,
> If you think the relevant section is not sufficient, it's
> your turn to provide a short and precise suggestion for a
> change, preferable a diff against the R-devel sources. That
> way you may be able to convince an R Core member to work on it.
I would be more than happy to rearrange the parts I have identified as hard to
find or under inappropriate headings and add the odd qualification to help folk
find the useful bits; if that's all you need I will do so and send you the diff.
The caveat is that i) that leaves a comparative amateur hacking about in
'Writing R extensions' and 'R Installation and administration' and b) I cannot
guarantee that the result will represent the best practice you want people to
adopt because only you know that.
Alternatively I will be happy to provide some suggested editorial changes to
you - based on what I've already said - so that you can think about them and
maybe include them together with your own recommendations.
Let me know what you'd like me to do.
Steve E*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
