Somehow I don't see my own postings in the list, so sorry for replying
to my own message and not the one that went out to the list.
I got a little further and I think I found exactly the thing that is
bothering me: how to get "extended" method dispatch going in 'setAs()':
setRefClass("A", fields=list(X="numeric"))
setRefClass("B", contains="A", fields=list(Y="character"))
setAs(from="numeric", to="A",
def=function(from,to){
out <- getRefClass(to)$new(X=from)
return(out)
}
)
a <- as(1:5, "A")
a$X
b <- as(1:5, "B")
My problem is the last statement (b <- as(1:5, "B") which fails. I want
to get around having to write new 'setAs' methods for all classes
extending class 'A'. If 'B' inherits from 'A', shouldn't it then be
possible to tell 'setAs' to look for the next suitable method, i.e. the
method defined for 'A'? I tried 'NextMethod()' inside the body of
'setAs' but that didn't work out.
Thanks a lot,
Janko
On 06.06.2011 17:15, Janko Thyson wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I wonder how to write methods for the function 'as' in the sense that
> I can call 'as(object, Class, strict=TRUE, ext)' and let method
> dispatch figure out the correct method.
>
> AFAIU, there is a difference between, e.g. 'as.data.frame' and the
> methods of 'as()' as stated above since the former depends on arg 'x'
> instead of 'object', 'Class' etc.?
>
> > methods("as")
> > as.data.frame
>
> I have to admit that I'm not really familiar with the S3 style of
> defining methods as I have been coding in S4 a lot, but my first
> attempt was to write something like this:
>
> as.myClass <- function(x, ...){
> if(is(x, "data.frame"){
> x <- as.list(x)
> }
> if(is(x, "character"){
> x <- as.list(x)
> }
> ...
> out <- getRefClass("myClass")$new(X=x)
> return(out)
> }
>
> But that way I'd have to explicitly call 'as.myClass(x)' whereas I'd
> simply like to type 'as(x, "myClass")'.
> Also, how is it possible to have method dispatch recognize two
> signature arguments in S3? I.e., how can I define something like
> 'as.data.frame.character' in order to have explicit "sub" methods for
> all the data types of 'x' so I wouldn't have to process them all in
> the definition of 'as.myClass' as I did above?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Janko
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
