OK, that is not the definition of cor in the stats package. Some add-on
package you are loading might be overwriting it.
What happens if you do
stats::cor(x1,x2)
?
Ken Spriggs wrote:
> I get the following:
>
>> cor
> function (x, y = NULL, use = "all.obs", method = c("pearson",
> "kendall", "spearman"))
> {
> UseMethod("cor")
> }
>
>
>
>
> Erik Iverson wrote:
>> What happens when you type "cor" at the R prompt? Perhaps your calling
>> of the cor function is not calling the cor function in the stats package?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken Spriggs wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to do cor(x1,x2) and I get the following error:
>>> Error in cor.default(x1, x2) : missing observations in cov/cor
>>>
>>> A few things:
>>> 1. I've used cor() many times and have never encountered this error.
>>> 2. length(x1) = length(x2)
>>> 3. is.numeric(x1) = is.numeric(x2) = TRUE
>>> 4. which(is.na(x1)) = which(is.na(x2)) = integer(0) {the same goes
>>> for
>>> is.nan()}
>>> 5. I also try cor(x1,x2, use = "all.obs") and get the same error.
>>>
>>> What can be going wrong?
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>
>
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
