Thanks slre,
I seem to be making some progress now.
Using a colon instead of an asterisk in the code really changes things. I
had been getting residual SS and MS of zero. Which is ridiculous. Now I get
much more plausible values.
Also, When I used an asterisk instead of a colon It wouldn't give results
for three way interactions. With colons it will.
You are correct about plot being nested within treatment. There are six
plots in each of 2 treatments.
So, I guess I will have to perform a separate analysis to quantify the
effect of treatment.
Thanks again.
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: Combined.Rs
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Combined.Trt 1
52.80 52.805 96.2601 < 2.2e-16 ***
Combined.Plot 10
677.69 67.769 123.5380 < 2.2e-16 ***
as.factor(Combined.Day) 16
2817.47 176.092 321.0041 < 2.2e-16 ***
Combined.Trt:as.factor(Combined.Day) 16 47.82
2.989 5.4487 4.048e-10 ***
Combined.Trt:Combined.Plot:as.factor(Combined.Day)80 455.42 5.693
10.3776 < 2.2e-16 ***
Residuals
284 155.79 0.549
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ANOVA-1-too-few-degrees-of-freedom-tp3493349p3499649.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
