Am 15.04.2011 20:14, schrieb Christian Hennig:
Normality of the predictors doesn't belong to the assumptions of the
GLM, so you don't have to check this.
Note, however, that there are all kinds of potential problems which to
detect is fairly hopeless with n=11 and three predictors, so you
shouldn't be too confident about your results anyway.
Christian
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Simone Santoro wrote:
Hi,
I have found quite a few posts on normality checking of response
variables, but I am still in doubt about that. As it is easy to
understand I'm not a statistician so be patient please.
I want to estimate the possible effects of some predictors on my
response variable that is n? of males and n? of females
(cbind(males,females)), so, it would be:
fullmodel<-glm(cbind(males,females)~pred1+pred2+pred3, binomial)
I have n= 11 (ecological data, small sample size is a a frequent
problem!).
Someone told me that I have to check for normality of the predictors
(and in case transform to reach normality) but I am in doubt about the
fact that a normality test can be very informative with such a small
sample size.
Also, I have read that a normality test (Shapiro, Kolmogornov, Durbin,
etc.) can't tell you anything about the fact that the distribution is
normal but just that there is no evidence for non-normality.
Anyway, I am still looking for some sort of thumb of rule to be used
in these cases.
The question: is there some simple advice on the way one should
proceed in this cases to be reasonably confident of the results?
Thanks for any help you might provide
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
*** --- ***
Christian Hennig
University College London, Department of Statistical Science
Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, phone +44 207 679 1698
chr...@stats.ucl.ac.uk, www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucakche
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
if you count no of males and females, shouldn't you choose the poisson
family? maybe whoever you told you to check for normality referred to
that, since count data are not normally distributed (neither are their
errors)! maybe thats all he/she wants!
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
