Hi Petr, Your idea looks like logically. So, can we say this with your idea; the expected number of computation in unique(sample(...)) is fewer than sample(...). Because, the expected length is 63.39677 in unique case, while the expected length is 100 in non-unique case ?
Thanks for reply, Helin. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Comparison-of-the-amount-of-computation-tp3448436p3448986.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
