1. I am not an expert on this. 2. However, my strong prior would be no, since because it is "exact" it has to calculate all the possible configurations and there are a lot to calculate with the values of n1 and n2 you gave.
-- Bert On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Jim Silverton <jim.silver...@gmail.com>wrote: > Is anyone aware of a fast way of doing fisher's exact test for a series of > 2 > x 2 tables in R? The fisher.test is really slow if n1=1000 and n2 = 1000. > > -- > Thanks, > Jim. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html<http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- "Men by nature long to get on to the ultimate truths, and will often be impatient with elementary studies or fight shy of them. If it were possible to reach the ultimate truths without the elementary studies usually prefixed to them, these would not be preparatory studies but superfluous diversions." -- Maimonides (1135-1204) Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
