On Mar 14, 2011, at 17:57 , Giles Crane wrote: > Greetings, > > The aov() function may mislabel > the random effects as in the example below: > Has anybody else noticed this?
What's "mislabeled" about it??? Looks like you nave an unbalanced design (in which case, aov() may be the wrong tool.) -pd > > Cordially, > Giles Crane, MPH, ASA, NJPHA > gilescr...@verizon.net > > > m2 > > Call: > aov(formula = y ~ ap + pe + Error(ju), data = d) > > Grand Mean: 77.50667 > > Stratum 1: ju > > Terms: > ap > Sum of Squares 4322.538 > Deg. of Freedom 12 > > 13 out of 25 effects not estimable > Estimated effects may be unbalanced > > Stratum 2: Within > > Terms: > ap pe Residuals > Sum of Squares 7047.885 255.034 2981.290 > Deg. of Freedom 25 2 35 > > Residual standard error: 9.229285 > Estimated effects may be unbalanced > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Peter Dalgaard Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
