On 14 March 2011 11:43, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11-03-14 7:32 AM, Amos Folarin wrote: > >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Duncan Murdoch<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> >>> To: Amos Folarin<amosfola...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:57 -0400 >>> Subject: Re: [R] Problems getting html files out of R CMD check >>> On 11-03-13 7:14 PM, Amos Folarin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There >>>> seems >>>> to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file >>>> that's >>>> constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files >>>> independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files >>>> without >>>> complaint. >>>> >>>> >>> R doesn't build .html files any more unless you ask it to explicitly, >>> e.g. >>> using R CMD Rdconv. >>> >>> Duncan Murdoch >>> >>> >> >> >> Thanks Duncan, I guess much of the documentation "out there" still >> indicate >> this functionality. >> > > If it's R Project documentation, you should tell us about it, and we'll fix > it. If you're finding it on a third party website, consider it a warning > about the reliability of the source. > > Duncan Murdoch > Yes, I stand warned. But perhaps a heads-up would be useful in the docs (there is some information about this in the vignettes section but I think it's worth including this in the documentation for "R CMD check" to prevent confusion. I suppose implicitly you expect the html to be generated given that the pdf manual is created at this step). [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.