Dear All, Can anyone provide me with reference notes(or steps) towards analysis of (un)balanced panel data in R.
Thank you! Kind regards, Tabitha Mundia , Project Management Office, Equity Bank Limited,P.O. Box 75104-00200 Head Office, Upper hill, NHIF BLDG, 14th Floor, Nairobi, Kenya Direct Extension : +254732112721  Mobile: +254722309538 Email: tabitha.mun...@equitybank.co.keskype ID: twamaeYahoo ID: tabygath...@yahoo.com An idea not coupled with action will never get any bigger than the brain cell it occupied. Arnold Glasgow ...... "Attempt something large enough that failure is guaranteedâ¦unless God steps in!" --- On Wed, 12/29/10, Manoj Aravind <aravin...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Manoj Aravind <aravin...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [R] Problem applying McNemar's - Different values in SPSS and R To: "Marc Schwartz" <marc_schwa...@me.com> Cc: r-help@r-project.org Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010, 2:48 PM Thank you Marc :) It Certainly helped me to get the exact value of P. How to understand when to apply mcnemar.exact or just mcnemar.test? I'm a beginner to biostatistics. Manoj Aravind On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Marc Schwartz <marc_schwa...@me.com>wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Manoj Aravind wrote: > > > Hi friends, > > I get different values for McNemar's test in R and SPSS. Which one should > i > > rely on when the p values differ. > > I came across this problem when i started learning R and seriously give > up > > on SPSS or any other proprietary software. > > Thank u in advance > > > > Output in SPSS follows > > > > *Crosstab* > > > > > >         hsc > > > > Total > > > >    ABN > > > > NE > > > > ABN > > > > tvs > > > > ABN > > > > Count > > > > 40 > > > > 3 > > > > 43 > > > >    Row % > > > > 93.0% > > > > 7.0% > > > > 100.0% > > > >    COL% > > > > 78.4% > > > > 30.0% > > > > 70.5% > > > > NE > > > > Count > > > > 11 > > > > 7 > > > > 18 > > > >    Row % > > > > 61.1% > > > > 38.9% > > > > 100.0% > > > >    COL% > > > > 21.6% > > > > 70.0% > > > > 29.5% > > > > Total > > > > Count > > > > 51 > > > > 10 > > > > 61 > > > > Row % > > > > 83.6% > > > > 16.4% > > > > 100.0% > > > > COL% > > > > 100.0% > > > > 100.0% > > > > 100.0% > > > > > > > > * Chi-Square Tests* > > > > > >   Value > > > > Exact Sig. (2-sided) > > > > McNemar Test > > > > .057(a) > > > > N of Valid Cases > > > > 61 > > > >   a Binomial distribution used. > > > > Output from R is as follows.... > > > >> tvshsc<- > > > > + matrix(c(40,11,3,7), > > > > + nrow=2, > > > > + dimnames=list("TVS"=c("ABN","NE"), > > > > + "HSC"=c("ABN","NE"))) > > > >> tvshsc > > > >    HSC > > > > TVS   ABN NE > > > > ABN 40 3 > > > > NE   11 7 > > > >> mcnemar.test(tvshsc) > > > > > > McNemar's Chi-squared test with continuity correction > > > > > > data: tvshsc > > > > McNemar's chi-squared = 3.5, df = 1, p-value = 0.06137 > > > > Regards > > > > Dr. B Manoj Aravind > > > The SPSS test appears to be an exact test, whereas the default R function > does not perform an exact test, so you are not comparing Apples to Apples... > > Try this using the 'exact2x2' CRAN package: > > > require(exact2x2) > Loading required package: exact2x2 > Loading required package: exactci > > > mcnemar.exact(matrix(c(40, 11, 3, 7), 2, 2)) > >    Exact McNemar test (with central confidence intervals) > > data: matrix(c(40, 11, 3, 7), 2, 2) > b = 3, c = 11, p-value = 0.05737 > alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1 > 95 percent confidence interval: > 0.04885492 1.03241985 > sample estimates: > odds ratio > 0.2727273 > > > HTH, > > Marc Schwartz > >    [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.