When building packages these days I keep getting warnings from
"R CMD build" to the effect that INDEX is not up to date. The
INDEXes always seem to be up do to date to *me*.
Then I thought to compare the INDEX from the package source with
the INDEX in the installed package (after building with the --force
flag set).
Doing a diff on the old INDEX (saved outside the source package directory
so that --force didn't obliterate it) and the new INDEX in the installed
package directory, I got:
> 7c7
> < in terms of the NCEA gpa.
> ---
> > in terms of the NCEA
> 19c19
> < number of successes ("old" and "new").
> ---
> > number of successes
> 32,33c32
> < doing calculations pertaining to the analysis
> < of data sets in the Starpath project.
> ---
> > doing calculations
Notice that the lines in the ``new'' INDEX are truncated versions of
those in the ``old'' INDEX.
This is not as it should be, nicht wahr? Can it be fixed? Can *I*
do anything to fix it? I am 99.99% confident that things weren't this
way in the past --- and that in fact the ``old'' INDEX was built using
the Rdindex() function.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P. S.:
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.12.0 (2010-10-15)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_NZ.UTF-8/en_NZ.UTF-8/C/C/en_NZ.UTF-8/en_NZ.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] tools datasets utils stats graphics grDevices methods
[8] base
other attached packages:
[1] misc_0.0-13 gtools_2.6.2 spatstat_1.20-5 deldir_0.0-12
[5] mgcv_1.6-2 fortunes_1.4-0 MASS_7.3-8
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] grid_2.12.0 lattice_0.19-13 Matrix_0.999375-44 nlme_3.1-97
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
