Dear R users,

As substitute() help page points out:
     Substituting and quoting often causes confusion when the argument
     is 'expression(...)'. The result is a call to the 'expression'
     constructor function and needs to be evaluated with 'eval' to give
     the actual expression object.

And indeed I am confused. Consider:

> dat <- data.frame(x=1:10, y=1:10)

> subsetexp <- substitute(a<x, list(a=5))

## this doesn't work
> subset(dat, subsetexp)
Error in subset.data.frame(dat, subsetexp) :
  'subset' must evaluate to logical

## this does work (thanks to the help page), but one needs to remember to call 
eval
> subset(dat, eval(subsetexp))


Is there a way to create subsetexp that needs no eval inside the call to 
subset()?

I experimented with the following, but it didn't work:
> subsetexp <- eval(substitute(a<x, list(a=5)))
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'x' not found

Thank you very much for your help,
Vadim

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and 
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination 
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the 
sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments.  Email 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Jump Trading, 
therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of 
this email or any attachments.  This email is for informational purposes only 
and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any 
kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a 
financial product.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to