> Perhaps as long as you're learning a new plotting system, you might also > check out whether ggplot2 might be an option. > > I did a quick and dirty version (which I'm sure Hadley can improve and > also remind me how to get rid of the legend that shows the "3" that I > set the size to). > > Assuming your data is re-shaped, so it comes out something like mine in > the artificial example below, then it's a two-liner in ggplot: > > > maxdat.df <- data.frame ( > score1 = rnorm(9, mean = rep(c(10,20,30), each = 3), sd = 1 ) , > SD = runif(9) * 2 + .5, > Group = factor ( rep ( c("V", "W", "X"), each = 3 ) ), > subGroup = rep( c("B","M","T"), 3) ) > > maxdat.df > > library(ggplot2) > ggp <- ggplot ( maxdat.df, aes (y = score1, x = interaction(Group , > subGroup), min = score1 - SD, max = score1 + SD, size = 3) ) > ggp + geom_pointrange() + coord_flip()
Take the size = 3 out of the aesthetic mappings, and put it directly in geom_pointrange(size = 3) - this way you are setting the size to 3 (mm) rather than asking ggplot to map a variable containing only the value 3 to the size of the points/lines. It's a subtle but important distinction, and I need to figure out how to explain it better. Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.