hello,
I have been using the per function in package longmemo to obtain a
simple raw periodogram.
I am considering to switch to the function spec.pgram since I want to be
able to do tapering.
To compare both I used spec.pgram with the options as suggested in the
documentation of per {longmemo} to make them correspond.
Now I have found on a variety of examples that there is a shift between
the log of the periodogram with per and that with spec.pgram. This
vertical shift amounts to approx. 1.8 on the log scale (the graph of
spec.pgram being above the one from per).
Is there some explanation for this ? Is the one from spec.pgram the
better one as suggested in the documentation of per {longmemo}? Finally
how are these related to an estimate of the spectral density obtained
from spec.arima ?
Many thanks for help and clarification.
Lieven Desmet
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
