Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard <at> biostat.ku.dk> writes:
> > > > Has something changed from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 that may require JVM > 1.4.1? > > If > > so, I can use that information to request an upgrade of my JVM. > > > > > > > Hmm, could be. They got rebuilt on my system and committted at some > point in the 2.6.1 run-in. and that system has 1.5.0. I did check that > things still worked, but I didn't think the version would matter. The > actual Java code is unchanged, so you could copy the .class files over > from 2.6.0 (& let us know if it works) > Excellent! That worked. Thanks, Peter. If this is going to be a continuing issue for future versions, would the best advice be to upgrade JVM anyway, at least to 1.5.0? Michael ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
