Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard <at> biostat.ku.dk> writes:

> >  
> > Has something changed from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 that may require JVM > 1.4.1?
> >  If 
> > so, I can use that information to request an upgrade of my JVM.
> >  
> >
> >   
> Hmm, could be. They got rebuilt on my system and committted at some 
> point in the 2.6.1 run-in. and that system has 1.5.0. I did check that 
> things still worked, but I didn't think the version would matter. The 
> actual Java code is unchanged, so you could copy the .class files over 
> from 2.6.0 (& let us know if it works)
> 
Excellent!  That worked.  Thanks, Peter.
If this is going to be a continuing issue for future versions, would the best 
advice be to upgrade JVM anyway, at least to 1.5.0?

Michael

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to