If you write an update.X method where X is the class of your graph objects then it will work on your graph objects and yet still work on lm, glm, etc.
On Nov 20, 2007 7:01 AM, Søren Højsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I wonder if it is "bad style" (or something worse) to create an "update" > function which does not work on model objects of the lm, glm etc. type. > Specifically, I have some graph objects (graphs as mathematical objects, not > as displays) which I want to alter and for that purpose I thought of writing > an update function. Would doing so violate a "deeper philosophy" in the R > system or have other unfortunate consequences. If so, I'm happy to hear other > suggestions... > > Regards > Søren ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
