Am 14.09.2007 um 14:12 schrieb Petr PIKAL:

> Hi
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal dne 14.09.2007 13:50:58:
>
>> Birgit Lemcke wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 14.09.2007 um 12:05 schrieb Peter Dalgaard:
>>>
>>>> S Ellison wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14/09/2007  
>>>>>>>> 09:26:16 >>>
>>>>>>>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, but....
>>>>
>>>> I don't think lme() will do better than what you can do by hand:  
>>>> Get
> two
>>>> independent estimates of mu1-mu2 (one estimate from the pairs  
>>>> and one
>>>> from the singlets), compute a weighted average using the s.e.'s and
> test
>>>> that against zero (possibly after testing them for equality for  
>>>> good
>>>> measure). This is easy if you use a plug-in approach: first assume
> that
>>>> the s.e. are known, then plug in their empirical value. The tricky
> bit
>>>> is to calculate the DF in the style of Welch's test.
>>>
>>>             I apologise but I really can not follow your  
>>> explanations.
>>> I am  R and Stastistics Beginner.
>>>
>>>             What do you mean with mu1-mu2 and what are s.e.´s?
>>>
>> That was a reply to S. Ellison. If you don't understand it, don't  
>> worry;
>> you'll probably need to read a book chapter or more about weighted
>> analyses to get up to speed for that.
>>
>> mu1, mu2 : (theoretical) mean for group 1, 2
>> s.e.: standard error
>
> But as Birgit actually does not have any paired values, according  
> to the
> data she had sent, she can not do paired t.test at all. The only  
> way is to
> compare averages from each vector by non paired t.test or to get  
> some new
> values for which she have counterparts.
>
> Regards
> Petr
>       
That is what I found out some hours ago. I thought about this problem  
and in my opinion it makes no sense to test the both vectors for  
significant differences, because I can not use another method for  
this vectors than for the other 24 vectors to test. To get new values  
is also not possible. And so I decided  that I will not test this two  
vectors for significance because of too many missing values.

But I thank you all
for your efforts to help me.

Greetings

Birgit
>
>
>>>             Once again thank you for your help.
>>>
>>>             Birgit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Øster Farimagsgade 5, 
> Entr.B
>>>>   c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
>>>>  (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph:  (+45)
>>>> 35327918
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])                  FAX: (+45)
>>>> 35327907
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Birgit Lemcke
>>> Institut für Systematische Botanik
>>> Zollikerstrasse 107
>>> CH-8008 Zürich
>>> Switzerland
>>> Ph: +41 (0)44 634 8351
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>    O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
>>   c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
>>  (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph:  (+45)
> 35327918
>> ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])                  FAX: (+45)
> 35327907
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

Birgit Lemcke
Institut für Systematische Botanik
Zollikerstrasse 107
CH-8008 Zürich
Switzerland
Ph: +41 (0)44 634 8351
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to