On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:46:57AM +0100, S Ellison wrote:
>
>
> >>> Gabor Csardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14/09/2007 09:27:03 >>>
> >x[ is.na(x) ] <- 0
> >
> >should work in most cases i think.
>
> ... only you probably shouldn't be doing that at all. Words like 'bias'
> spring to mind...
>
> Woudn't it be better to accept the NA's and find methods that handle them as
> genuinely missing. R is usually quite good at that.
Although in some cases the proper handling of NA values is to treat
them az zeros....
I like this list because if you ask a question,
they don't only solve it immediately (in five different ways), but they
persuade you that what you're trying to do is actually
incorrect/stupid/uninteresting or your problem just makes no sense at all.
:)
Gabor
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:08:19AM +0200, Alfredo Alessandrini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > how can I replace NA value with 0:
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use, co...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Csardi Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MTA RMKI, ELTE TTK
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
