The higher precedence of %/% is documented in ?Syntax. Did something in particular make you think that it had the same precedence?
Tim > On 31 Jan 2025, at 13:37, Lionel Fotie via R-devel <r-devel@r-project.org> > wrote: > > Dear R Development Team, > > I have encountered an unexpected behavior in R 4.4.1 regarding the precedence > of / and %/%. > > Steps to reproduce: > print(2 * 10 / 2 %/% 50) > > Expected result: > Since *, / and %/% have the same precedence, evaluation should be > left-to-right: > (2 * 10) / 2 %/% 50 # Expected: 0 > > Actual result: > [1] Inf > > Workaround: > Adding explicit parentheses fixes the issue: > print(((2 * 10) / 2) %/% 50) # Returns 0 (as expected) > > This suggests that %/% is evaluated before /, contradicting the expected > left-associativity. > Could you please confirm if this is a known issue ? > > Best regards, > > LIONEL FOTIE > Data Scientist > - > GroupM Germany GmbH > - > Office: +49211 81991563 > Völklinger Straße 33 | 40221 Düsseldorf | Germany > - > Join us: Karriere <https://karriere.groupm.de/de> | > www.groupm.de<https://www.groupm.de/> > Follow us: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/GroupMGermany> | > X<https://twitter.com/GroupMGermany> | > Xing<https://www.xing.com/companies/groupmgermanygmbh> | > LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/groupm-germany/> | > Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/groupm_germany/?hl=de> > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
