Hi Andreas,
On 3/26/21 8:48 PM, Andreas Kersting wrote:
> Hi Dirk, > > Sure, let me try to explain: > > CRAN ran the tests of my
> package
using R which was configured > --with-valgrind-instrumentation > 0.
Valgrind reported many errors > related to the use of supposedly
uninitialized memory and the CRAN > team asked me to tackle these. > >
These errors are false positives, because I pass a custom allocator > to
allocVector3() which hands out memory which is already > initialized.
However, this memory is explicitly marked for Valgrind > as
uninitialized by allocVector3(), and I do not initialize it >
subsequently, so Valgrind complains. > > Now I am asking if it is
correct that allocVector3() marks memory as > uninitialized/undefined,
even if it comes from a custom allocator. > This is because
allocVector3() cannot know if the memory might > already by initialized.
I think the semantics of allocVector/allocVector3 should be the same
regardless of whether custom allocators are used. The semantics of
allocVector is to provide uninitialized memory (non-pointer types,
Writing R Extensions 5.9.2). Therefore, it is the caller who needs to
take care of initialization. This is also the semantics of "malloc" and
Rallocators.h says "custom_alloc_t mem_alloc; /* malloc equivalent */".
So I think that your code using your custom allocator needs to
initialize allocated memory to be correct. If your allocator initializes
the memory, that is fine, but unnecessary.
So technically speaking, the valgrind reports are not false alarms. I
think your call sites should initialize.
Best
Tomas
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
